Something to Ponder
“To believe in something, and not to live it, is dishonest” (Mahatma Gandhi).
“You have heard that our ancestors were told, ‘You must not murder. If you commit murder, you are subject to judgment.’ But I say, if you are even angry with someone, you are subject to judgment!” (Jesus).
An Invitation to Ponder
What do you think would happen if you threw a big party and invited all your Facebook friends? Would they enjoy each other’s company, or would the event turn into something resembling a cat dropped into a room full of dogs? I’d hope for the former, but I’d fear the latter.
My collection of Facebook friends are a diverse bunch. They’re scattered across parts of five continents. Several are devoutly religious, while others are ambivalent or antagonistic toward any religion. My friends include right-wingers and left-wingers. Some of their posts would offend others. Some might incite others. Some of them have offended and distressed me. Yet, one way or another, they call me their friend, and I am honored by their acceptance.
Civility in contemporary society is in a state of crisis. Discourse is often reduced to demeaning, demonizing, and dehumanizing levels. Vilifying someone from another point-of-view has become the default button that is pushed to elevate or destroy positions or the person. Pick the labels.
Treating those from different cultural, religious, political, racial, or social positions with courtesy, dignity, and respect has become an abandoned practice.
Recently, I watched a television interview with the leader of a socio-political movement. A documented strategy of this group is their advocacy for acts of violence against its enemies as a means to achieve their ends. Destruction of public property, physical attacks upon individuals, and preventing speakers from opposite points of view from presenting their ideas in public forums are some of their tactics. Broadly defined, anyone who held a counter viewpoint or who was remotely related to their enemies—guilt by distant association—was a justified target. Since the leader believed their ultimate objective was morally righteous, they were within their rights to exercise any means necessary to achieve those ends, even violent and nefarious tactics.
To create a more civilized society, I am submitting for your consideration a guiding principle espoused by Mahatma Gandhi during India’s freedom movement. For Gandhi, the means that they used to achieve their ends were all important. He could never use the wrong means to achieve the right end. So important was this principle that he was prepared to halt his movement, even when they were successful if the ends were not as morally equal to their objective. The means never justified the ends.
In our interactions and endeavors, the means that we utilize must be consistent with the ends we are seeking to accomplish. This principle has application in significant and insignificant realms. Violent means cannot be used to obtain nonviolent goals. Falsifying information is not an appropriate means to represent the truth. Demeaning another human being is not consistent with elevating noble human values. Living this lifestyle is difficult. When someone demeans, demonizes, and dehumanizes us, those we love, or a position we hold, retaliation with equal force is a natural reflex. But it is not a moral or civil reflex.
In my personal life, I am committing to these ideals. I will:
How do you practice civility in your own life?
What are some examples that you have observed where the means are beneath the ends that they seek to promote?
Can you think of any instances where the methods employed are justified in being inconsistent with the ultimate value?
What suggestions do you have to create a more civil society?
Garden of the Gods, Colorado USA